- From: Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:58:16 +0200
- To: "Doug Schepers" <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- Cc: "Jean-Yves Bitterlich" <Jean-Yves.Bitterlich@sun.com>, public-webapi <public-webapi@w3.org>, "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
2007/6/27, Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>: > > Hi, Jean-Yves- > > Jean-Yves Bitterlich wrote: > > > > We find it unfortunate that past resolutions within the working group are being > > invalidated (unless of course there are new evidences/information that justify > > this act) in particular because this behavior leads to rehashing issues instead > > of moving forward. > > I could not agree more with this sentiment. I know of no reason this > issue should have been reopened, since there was no new evidence. But > ultimately, it is not that important, which makes it all the more > frustrating that it was reopened and effort was wasted. Yeah, this is a "me too". However, I do think this is important. So basically, I'm just really unhappy about this. Just posting a new proposal, without even mentioning about what was decided before, it's just very frustrating to me :( I feel being treated very unfairly :( > > However, and for the sake of progress, we will go along with the new decision > > taken in consensus by the WebAPI WG. > > That's very gracious of you. It's important that we use consensus to > move forward, rather than to block progress. Well, I won't "block any progress" from now on :( Regards, Martijn > Regards- > -Doug > > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 21:58:20 UTC