On Apr 21, 2006, at 00:18, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Make it a SHOULD and twiddle your CR exit criteria to take it into > account; in the long term, implementations will sort themselves out. My thoughts exactly. > The real danger here is that the WG will be tempted to use the API > to profile other parts of HTTP for convenience, or based on current > implementations, as well. Please, don't. Precisely. Anne raised concerns about exiting CR, but if we start profiling HTTP we'll never get out of LC. I can already hear the hordes clamouring "when you pry RFC 2616 from the impervious grasp of my cold, dead fingers". > I'd also note that Apache preserves the casing of HTTP method all > the way through mod_cgi. That's the case with all the server-side implementations that I'm aware of. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/Received on Thursday, 20 April 2006 23:19:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT