W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-security@w3.org > February 2015

Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Rechartering discussion - Gemalto contribution

From: Siva Narendra <siva@tyfone.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 08:49:29 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJhTYQzQy7bt51NAiy_-za2XsdV4Dx+sR3MqOkzQAmiesbqtAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org" <public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org>, GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, public-web-security@w3.org, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Is payments also an overkill?
On Feb 3, 2015 6:02 AM, "Anders Rundgren" <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 2015-02-03 14:31, Rigo Wenning wrote:
>
>> Anders,
>>
>> On Tuesday 03 February 2015 12:42:07 Anders Rundgren wrote:
>>
>>> Although I agree with what you are saying there's a problem:
>>>
>>> None of the stuff you are referring to has ever been directly connected
>>> to the [UNTRUSTED] web, they are always used with a trusted App + GU.
>>>
>>
>> if everybody had already thought about it, my contribution would be
>> noise. My
>> apologies if this is the case. This is a chartering discussion. If
>> thinking
>> about the eGov use case is overkill, we should state that openly and move
>> on.
>> I just want this to be a conscious decision. This enables W3C to respond
>> if
>> asked by the various governments.
>>
>>
> Hi Rigo,
>
> eGov is definitely not overkill, the problem as I see it is that you
> cannot develop
> things of this complexity without having a "team" dealing with the
> different aspects.
>
> Fortunately there's an alternative to shoehorning legacy-crypto in the
> UNTRUSTED web:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-intents/2015Feb/0000.html
>
> Best regards,
> Anders
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2015 16:49:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 3 February 2015 16:49:57 UTC