W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [profile] Profile spec title

From: Masahito Kawamori <masahito.kawamori@ties.itu.int>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:25:14 +0900
Message-ID: <CAD0ETOC2Mx30GZFA_XJVmo_2RFkDmbz-ggmF6sbNJ7NLAAm3MA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
Cc: Jan Lindquist <jan.lindquist@ericsson.com>, "Vickers, Mark" <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Giuseppe, all

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Having read all the comments so far I still think the best compromise
> between different opinions is
>
>
> "Web and TV profile"
> Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a browser-based
> environment

I agree.  (but then again, the question may remain, "hasn't that been
the intention of HTML5 <video>?". Well, it is ok for the time being,
as a straw man, at least.)

>
> possible variation
>
> "WebTV profile"
>
> Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a browser-based
> environment

Would not probably work, as pointed out by Yusuke.

Thanks.

Masahito


> /g
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> mav
>>
>>
>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:58 AM, Jan Lindquist wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> The profile is not only about HTML5 but other W3c standards so it would
>>> be misleading to have HTML5 in the title. In the spirit of the IG how about
>>> "web and TV profile". The name of the profile is not as critical as knowing
>>> the breadth of the areas it should cover. This profile may live for a while
>>> and it in the context of the industry attempt to influence the work in W3C
>>> with a clear list of specs that are being used and how they may be used. It
>>> will become a reference point by other standard groups. By using the same
>>> name as the IG it can help see the relationship.
>>> Regards,
>>> JanL
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Vickers, Mark [mailto:Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com]
>>>> Sent: den 7 februari 2012 15:24
>>>> To: Giuseppe Pascale
>>>> Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG
>>>> Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title
>>>>
>>>> How about "HTML5 Video Services Profile"?
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 3:28 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:26:40 +0100, Vickers, Mark
>>>>
>>>> <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> 5. Title: The goal for me is a profile of HTML5 for video
>>>>
>>>> services. There are two differences with "Web&TV Profile".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - I want to include HTML5 in the title because this is
>>>>
>>>> HTML5-related
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and HTM5-centric
>>>>>> - I don't like including "TV". This continues to cause
>>>>
>>>> confusion. It is clearer to describe an HTML5 profile for
>>>> video services.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have strong opinions on the title but I would note
>>>>
>>>> the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> - A title should be short ( the subtitle explains a bit
>>>>
>>>> more what we are doing).
>>>>>
>>>>> - I've tried to use the word "TV services" in the subtitle that is
>>>>> hopefully a bit less confusing (or maybe not?). I have defined this
>>>>> term as
>>>>>
>>>>> "For the purposes of this document a TV service is a
>>>>
>>>> commercial video service that may include elements of
>>>> interactivity and that provides a coherent user experience.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - while this profile is html5 based this is not only about
>>>>
>>>> html5. I'm not against highlighting the HTML5 centric
>>>> approach but I wouldn't call this "an html5 profile".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So in short: I'm fine with your comments but I cannot come
>>>>
>>>> up with a better title/subtitle. Suggestions are welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> /g
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> See you on the call.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> mav
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 6, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One note: the zakim bridge is overbooked.
>>>>>>> So just in case we see that people have problem dialing
>>>>
>>>> in (in such
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> case please login on IRC and let us know) I set-up this
>>>>
>>>> Opera bridge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NOTE: ONLY TO BE USED IF WE SEE THAT ZAKIM DOESN'T WORK
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Phone bridge details:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Conference ID:            33909
>>>>>>> Start Date and Time:      Monday 06.02.2012 17:00:00 CET/CEST
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bridge Numbers:
>>>>>>> Norway                           +47 23 69 26 03
>>>>>>> USA                                +1 800 201 4229 (Toll-Free)
>>>>>>> Poland (Wroclaw)                +48 71 719 6099
>>>>>>> Poland (Warsaw)                 +48 22 262 0799
>>>>>>> Japan                             +81 3 5435 8394
>>>>>>> Russia                            +7 812 448 7876
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Conference Name:          tv profile
>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Please contact SysAdmin at +47 23 69 33 60 for assistance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /g
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:06:15 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale
>>>>
>>>> <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here the call details for todays call
>>>>>>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Telco)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Schedule: Monday, 16:00Z (=8:00 Pacific, 11:00 Eastern, 17:00
>>>>>>>> Europe, 01:00 Korea/Japan)
>>>>>>>> Phone: US: +1 617 761 6200 or SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org Conference
>>>>>>>> Code: 26632 IRC channel: #webtv
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And here the Agenda for todays call:
>>>>>>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Agenda_Telco_6/2/2012)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Review of Charter
>>>>>>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Charter)
>>>>>>>> * Call schedule
>>>>>>>> * TF tools (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile)
>>>>>>>> * Process
>>>>>>>> * Initial feedbacks on the draft
>>>>>>>> (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webtv/raw-file/tip/tvprofile/tv.html)
>>>>>>>> * AOB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /g
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:00:59 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale
>>>>
>>>> <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>> the poll [1] is now closed and the winner is...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Monday, February 6, 2012 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM UTC
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In this first call we will discuss the scope of the TV
>>>>
>>>> profile work, how do we want the group to be organized and
>>>> timeline (if any).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you have any other topic you want to add to the
>>>>
>>>> agenda let me know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll send around call details ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] http://doodle.com/h6rfnkrqyi3uinpi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Giuseppe Pascale
>>>>>>> TV & Connected Devices
>>>>>>> Opera Software
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Giuseppe Pascale
>>>>> TV & Connected Devices
>>>>> Opera Software
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Giuseppe Pascale
> TV & Connected Devices
> Opera Software
>
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 10:29:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:06 UTC