RE: Comments 465, 466, 545 - Wording of Success Criterion 4.2.1, 4.2.3

Great

This is just what I was looking for an example of.   I was explaining this
to someone but couldn't find an example.

This is what I think the best approach for accessibility is.  

Some people don't like it because the "FIRST VERSION PEOPLE SEE" isn't the
pretty version  


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gez Lemon
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 4:17 PM
> To: Gregg Vanderheiden
> Cc: Katie Haritos-Shea; ryladog@earthlink.net; 
> public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Comments 465, 466, 545 - Wording of Success 
> Criterion 4.2.1, 4.2.3
> 
> 
> Hi Gregg,
> 
> > GV: do not follow this.  If  I land on a page from a search - and 
> > there are no accessible controls on the page, and I've 
> never been to 
> > the site before, how do I get to the accessible version?
> 
> This is probably easier to explain with an example. This is a 
> URL to an inaccessible page:
> 
> http://juicystudio.com/experiments/accessfirst/inaccessible.php
> 
> No matter how you arrive at that link, if you haven't already 
> set your options to say you want that version, you'll be 
> redirected to the accessible version. Once you opt-in for the 
> inaccessible version, you can visit it. This example is done 
> with PHP, but can also be achieved on the server with 
> environment variables to cater for other technologies.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Gez
> 
> --
> _____________________________
> Supplement your vitamins
> http://juicystudio.com
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 21:32:52 UTC