W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > June 2006

Re: Comments 465, 466, 545 - Wording of Success Criterion 4.2.1, 4.2.3

From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:06:20 +0100
Message-ID: <e2a28a920606281506i36be0160h7c4a5a416281d6e3@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: "Katie Haritos-Shea" <kharitos-shea@cri-solutions.com>, ryladog@earthlink.net, public-wcag-teamb@w3.org

Hi Gregg,

> This is just what I was looking for an example of.   I was explaining this
> to someone but couldn't find an example.
> This is what I think the best approach for accessibility is.

Yes, I agree.

> Some people don't like it because the "FIRST VERSION PEOPLE SEE" isn't the
> pretty version

I see this point, too, but there's nothing to say the accessible
version must be ugly.

Let me know when you want to discuss style sheet switching.

Best regards,


Supplement your vitamins
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 22:06:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:24 UTC