W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > June 2006

Re: Comments 465, 466, 545 - Wording of Success Criterion 4.2.1, 4.2.3

From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:06:20 +0100
Message-ID: <e2a28a920606281506i36be0160h7c4a5a416281d6e3@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: "Katie Haritos-Shea" <kharitos-shea@cri-solutions.com>, ryladog@earthlink.net, public-wcag-teamb@w3.org

Hi Gregg,

> This is just what I was looking for an example of.   I was explaining this
> to someone but couldn't find an example.
>
> This is what I think the best approach for accessibility is.

Yes, I agree.

> Some people don't like it because the "FIRST VERSION PEOPLE SEE" isn't the
> pretty version

I see this point, too, but there's nothing to say the accessible
version must be ugly.

Let me know when you want to discuss style sheet switching.

Best regards,

Gez

-- 
_____________________________
Supplement your vitamins
http://juicystudio.com
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 22:06:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:44 GMT