References: http://www.w3.org/mid/E1EEnGr-0005y6-Il@maggie.w3.org and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-teamb/2005Sep/0015.html Yvette did the right thing in tying our usage to what i18n says by citing http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-i18n-html-tech-lang-20050224/ On the other hand, the link in that document to the replacement for RFC 3066, commonly referred to as RFC 3066bis, is broken. So add http://www.w3.org/TR/itsreq/ to your bibliography for links that work. The moral is that 3066bis introduces improved functionality and will be normative in XML soon so we should be tracking it. Mostly I wanted to pass on the idea from Addison Phillips that this is coming. Further questions should be taken to him. AlReceived on Friday, 23 September 2005 22:06:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:42 GMT