W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > September 2005

Destination language (was: RE: minutes from today (team b))

From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:37:55 +0200 (MEST)
To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
Message-ID: <21486.1126867075@www78.gmx.net>

> Should we evalutate also the text-processing language for destination
> link / and or suggest a technique (using of hreflang? Is it supported?)

This is almost useless, since the language of a reference might per se be
unclear and/or contain "several languages" (due to content negotiation, for
example), and might always change without notice, of course. Due to the high
probability of wrong declarations I consider it unnecessary and harmful
work.

We should nonetheless encourage the use of "lang"/"xml:lang" for
translations, for example:

  <link rel="alternate" href="http://example.org/de/" title="Deutsch" 
    xml:lang="de" />


-- 
Jens Meiert
Information Architect

http://meiert.com/

http://uitest.com/ < Reloaded
Received on Friday, 16 September 2005 10:38:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:42 GMT