RE: [low priority] tracking progess and planning

I also like having a separate table for each SC-- especially with the
captions, it's much easier to keep track of where I am.

John

"Good design is accessible design."

Dr. John M. Slatin, Director 
Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin 
FAC 248C 
1 University Station G9600 
Austin, TX 78712 
ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524 
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu 
Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility 



-----Original Message-----
From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 1:16 PM
To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
Subject: Re: [low priority] tracking progess and planning



Wendy asks:
>I'm tracking our progress at [1].  I have two different formats on this
>page and am wondering which "view" people find more helpful.


I'll offer my two cents - I also prefer a separate table for each
success 
criteria.  While the overview is nice, having a separate table helps me
to 
focus on one thing at a time.

1] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2005/09/08-meaning-plan.html>


Becky Gibson
Web Accessibility Architect
                                                       
IBM Emerging Internet Technologies
5 Technology Park Drive
Westford, MA 01886
Voice: 978 399-6101; t/l 333-6101
Email: gibsonb@us.ibm.com