W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > January 2013

R: Sampling optional?

From: Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\) <r.scano@webprofession.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 08:21:27 +0100
To: "'Velleman, Eric'" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004901cdfc5e$ec52ff00$c4f8fd00$@webprofession.com>

Roberto Scano
International Webmasters Association / The HTML Writers Guild

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Velleman, Eric [mailto:evelleman@bartimeus.nl] 
Inviato: domenica 27 gennaio 2013 01:03
A: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Oggetto: Sampling optional?

Dear all,

We received great input to the new section about adding a random sample:
Things we may want to discuss as input for the next editor draft:

1. The section must be optional
Most of us use a random sample. It seems important for verification,
independence and the level of reliability. The paper that Vivienne sent
around indicates that just using the structured sample is not enough.

Proposed resolution: Keep it non-optional until we have more backing info
that random samples do not add to the results of the structured sample.

Let me know what you think?
Kindest regards,

Received on Sunday, 27 January 2013 07:21:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:23 UTC