W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > March 2012

Re: AW: proceeding with publication

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:07:10 +0200
Message-ID: <4F6F0A6E.600@w3.org>
To: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
CC: 'Eval TF' <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Thank you Kerstin.

As agreed, there will be several opportunities to further discuss 
different aspects of increasing the reliability and quality of the 
methodology. I look forward to discussing specific suggestions for 
improving particular sections of the document.

Best,
   Shadi


On 23.3.2012 10:58, Kerstin Probiesch wrote:
> Hi Shadi, all,
>
> I don't want to stand in the way and see the need the need for external
> feedback, more discussion on several points and a sense of achievement for
> reaching the first milestone of our work.
>
> I still have reservations concerning some points: missing goodness criteria,
> techniques chapter - a section which is still unclear for me and optional
> score which is against my conviction as long as we don't speak about
> comparing the websites of X companies and make a ranking on how much SCs are
> met.
>
> Anyway. It is a First Public Working Draft (FPWD and I'm now looking forward
> for the feedback from the public and further discussions.
>
> Best
>
> Kerstin
>
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Shadi Abou-Zahra [mailto:shadi@w3.org]
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. März 2012 04:48
>> An: Eval TF
>> Betreff: proceeding with publication
>>
>> Dear Eval TF,
>>
>> As discussed on the previous teleconference call, we agreed to proceed
>> with publishing the First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of our "Website
>> Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology 1.0".
>>
>> The latest draft, diff-marked version, and disposition of comments are:
>>    -<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120320>
>>    -<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120320-diff>
>>    -<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments>
>>
>> There has been one addition to the "Status of the Document" section, it
>> now contains a bullet asking for feedback on:
>>    - "Meeting the set _Requirements_, in particular on meeting the
>> _requirement for increasing inter-rater reliability_;"
>>
>> This change was to (1) refer readers to our requirements documents and
>> (2) to encourage feedback on improving the reliability of the document.
>>
>> There are also several other points that we will come back to for more
>> discussion, especially as we expand the currently empty sections.
>>
>> Congratulations on all of your hard work in achieving this milestone!
>>
>> Best,
>>     Shadi
>>
>> --
>> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
>> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
>> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
>> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
>
>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2012 12:07:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:13 GMT