W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > March 2012

RE: proceeding with publication

From: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:51:58 +0800
To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8AFA77741B11DB47B24131F1E38227A9B518EFE33C@XCHG-MS1.ads.ecu.edu.au>
Hi Shadi, Eric & TF

I'm pretty excited that we are now ready to publish our draft - it's so nice to have something to show others and get that all-important feedback.

Can you tell me the procedure now?  For example, can I send it to Australian Government departments and ask for feedback, or is this something handled on a W3C scale?  I don't want to send it around and then find out that I should have waited a bit longer.

Thanks - if I had a glass of vino to hand, I'd raise it in a salute to the group, but especially Eric and Shadi for all the hard work.


Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT
PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
Mob: 0415 383 673

This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
From: Shadi Abou-Zahra [shadi@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, 23 March 2012 12:47 PM
To: Eval TF
Subject: proceeding with publication

Dear Eval TF,

As discussed on the previous teleconference call, we agreed to proceed
with publishing the First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of our "Website
Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology 1.0".

The latest draft, diff-marked version, and disposition of comments are:
  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120320>
  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120320-diff>
  - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments>

There has been one addition to the "Status of the Document" section, it
now contains a bullet asking for feedback on:
  - "Meeting the set _Requirements_, in particular on meeting the
_requirement for increasing inter-rater reliability_;"

This change was to (1) refer readers to our requirements documents and
(2) to encourage feedback on improving the reliability of the document.

There are also several other points that we will come back to for more
discussion, especially as we expand the currently empty sections.

Congratulations on all of your hard work in achieving this milestone!


Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)

This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.

Received on Sunday, 25 March 2012 03:54:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:20 UTC