W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > March 2012

AW: proceeding with publication

From: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:58:39 +0100
To: "'Shadi Abou-Zahra'" <shadi@w3.org>, "'Eval TF'" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4f6c490e.a707b40a.3ec5.ffff891e@mx.google.com>
Hi Shadi, all,

I don't want to stand in the way and see the need the need for external
feedback, more discussion on several points and a sense of achievement for
reaching the first milestone of our work.

I still have reservations concerning some points: missing goodness criteria,
techniques chapter - a section which is still unclear for me and optional
score which is against my conviction as long as we don't speak about
comparing the websites of X companies and make a ranking on how much SCs are
met.

Anyway. It is a First Public Working Draft (FPWD and I'm now looking forward
for the feedback from the public and further discussions.

Best

Kerstin


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Shadi Abou-Zahra [mailto:shadi@w3.org]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. März 2012 04:48
> An: Eval TF
> Betreff: proceeding with publication
> 
> Dear Eval TF,
> 
> As discussed on the previous teleconference call, we agreed to proceed
> with publishing the First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of our "Website
> Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology 1.0".
> 
> The latest draft, diff-marked version, and disposition of comments are:
>   - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120320>
>   - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120320-diff>
>   - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments>
> 
> There has been one addition to the "Status of the Document" section, it
> now contains a bullet asking for feedback on:
>   - "Meeting the set _Requirements_, in particular on meeting the
> _requirement for increasing inter-rater reliability_;"
> 
> This change was to (1) refer readers to our requirements documents and
> (2) to encourage feedback on improving the reliability of the document.
> 
> There are also several other points that we will come back to for more
> discussion, especially as we expand the currently empty sections.
> 
> Congratulations on all of your hard work in achieving this milestone!
> 
> Best,
>    Shadi
> 
> --
> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 09:58:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:13 GMT