W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > April 2012

Mentioning tools

From: Alistair Garrison <alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 20:09:01 +0200
Message-Id: <7A0511BD-BC0A-464A-B922-A9501FECE0D8@gmail.com>
To: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Dear all, 

During our telecon today I believe someone mentioned that "as their tool did something in a certain way, would it not be possible for the evaluation to be done in the same way" - or at least that is what I processed.

Shouldn't our focus always be on producing the best evaluation methodology for an evaluator, regardless of the impact on our own stuff (tools, quality mark, etc...)?

All the best

Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 18:09:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:20 UTC