W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Comments on Target Audience - websites

From: Michael S Elledge <elledge@msu.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:41:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4E7B573E.3010006@msu.edu>
To: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@earthlink.net>
CC: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
That's a good point, Katie. Thanks for pointing it out.

Should we include "websites" in our glossary, then, in case other people 
are confused?

Mike

On 9/22/2011 11:27 AM, Katie Haritos-Shea wrote:
> Concerning the second issue "websites" to "websites and web-delivered applications".........
>
> I understand why this is being suggested, however, WCAG has a definition of "websites" that covers all kinds of web content. WCAG is web CONTENT accessibility guidelines, not the HTML accessibility guidelines.
>
> My 2 cents.............:-)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael S Elledge<elledge@msu.edu>
>> Sent: Sep 22, 2011 11:06 AM
>> To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org"<public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
>> Subject: Comments on Target Audience
>>
>> Hi Everyone--
>>
>> We may want to either revise a current use scenario or add a new one
>> that includes "vendors or organizations wishing to evaluate websites"
>> since I don't see a reference that would relate to companies doing this
>> work.
>>
>> Also, I would propose that we revise wording from "websites" to
>> "websites and web-delivered applications" since part of WCAG 2.0's
>> intent is to be technology-agnostic, and websites may be interpreted as
>> html-based content.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Mike
>>
>
> * katie *
>
> Katie Haritos-Shea
> Section 508 Technical Policy Analyst
>
> 703-371-5545
>
> People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did,
> but they will never forget how you made them feel.......
>
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 15:42:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT