Re: Additional Requiirement: documentation

Hi TF,

I agree with Eric that one person should be able to use the Methodology.


Kerstin

Am 21.09.2011 um 22:46 schrieb "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>:

> Hi Detlev,
> 
> Propose to not call it documentation but something like: 
> 
> * 'Support for independent verification: The Methodology supports independent verification and quality control of the evaluation results'.
> 
> We can work this out later when we start writing the Methodology. I think that in the Methodology we should not demand that cross checking or another form of independent verification is obligatory, but could point at the need and advantages of independent verification and cross checking of the evaluation results. One person should be able to use the Methodology for evaluation without the need for others.
> 
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Eric
> 
> ________________________________________
> Van: public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org [public-wai-evaltf-request@w3.org] namens Detlev Fischer [fischer@dias.de]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 20 september 2011 8:13
> Aan: EVAL TF
> Onderwerp: Additional Requiirement: documentation
> 
> Hi Eval TF,
> 
> I suggest a further requirement:
> 
> R16 Documentation: Documentation of pages and states to which ratings
> and comments apply to allow independent verification and quality assurance
> 
> Regards,
> Detlev
> 
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Detlev Fischer PhD
> DIAS GmbH - Daten, Informationssysteme und Analysen im Sozialen
> Geschäftsführung: Thomas Lilienthal, Michael Zapp
> 
> Telefon: +49-40-43 18 75-25
> Mobile: +49-157 7-170 73 84
> Fax: +49-40-43 18 75-19
> E-Mail: fischer@dias.de
> 
> Anschrift: Schulterblatt 36, D-20357 Hamburg
> Amtsgericht Hamburg HRB 58 167
> Geschäftsführer: Thomas Lilienthal, Michael Zapp
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 06:33:17 UTC