W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > September 2011

Re: additional requirements

From: <kvotis@iti.gr>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:47:35 +0300
Message-ID: <5c895cbc56e6276a540c13d7ae4ace6e.squirrel@mail.iti.gr>
To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
Cc: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Dear Eric,

the "support validity" requirement doesn;t support it with the usage of EARL?

regards

kostas




> Hi all,
>
> We could also consider:
>
> * Systematic
> The Methodology requires a controlled process and documentation in such a
> way that the evaluation can be checked later.
>
> * Support validity
> Evaluation method results are documented in a manner that it is later
> possible to see if what has been measured is valid to support a certain
> claim to conformance
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Eric
>
>
> =========================
> Eric Velleman
> Technisch directeur
> Stichting Accessibility
> Universiteit Twente
>
> Oudenoord 325,
> 3513EP Utrecht (The Netherlands);
> Tel: +31 (0)30 - 2398270
> www.accessibility.nl / www.wabcluster.org / www.econformance.eu /
> www.game-accessibility.com/ www.eaccessplus.eu
>
> Lees onze disclaimer: www.accessibility.nl/algemeen/disclaimer
> Accessibility is Member van het W3C
> =========================
>
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 06:48:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT