- From: <kvotis@iti.gr>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:47:35 +0300
- To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
- Cc: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Dear Eric, the "support validity" requirement doesn;t support it with the usage of EARL? regards kostas > Hi all, > > We could also consider: > > * Systematic > The Methodology requires a controlled process and documentation in such a > way that the evaluation can be checked later. > > * Support validity > Evaluation method results are documented in a manner that it is later > possible to see if what has been measured is valid to support a certain > claim to conformance > > Kindest regards, > > Eric > > > ========================= > Eric Velleman > Technisch directeur > Stichting Accessibility > Universiteit Twente > > Oudenoord 325, > 3513EP Utrecht (The Netherlands); > Tel: +31 (0)30 - 2398270 > www.accessibility.nl / www.wabcluster.org / www.econformance.eu / > www.game-accessibility.com/ www.eaccessplus.eu > > Lees onze disclaimer: www.accessibility.nl/algemeen/disclaimer > Accessibility is Member van het W3C > ========================= >
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 06:48:13 UTC