W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > September 2011

additional requirements

From: Velleman, Eric <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:18:28 +0000
To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3D063CE533923349B1B52F26312B0A46718C2E@s107ma.bart.local>
Hi all,

We could also consider:

* Systematic
The Methodology requires a controlled process and documentation in such a way that the evaluation can be checked later.

* Support validity
Evaluation method results are documented in a manner that it is later possible to see if what has been measured is valid to support a certain claim to conformance

Kindest regards,

Eric


=========================
Eric Velleman
Technisch directeur
Stichting Accessibility
Universiteit Twente

Oudenoord 325,
3513EP Utrecht (The Netherlands);
Tel: +31 (0)30 - 2398270
www.accessibility.nl / www.wabcluster.org / www.econformance.eu /
www.game-accessibility.com/ www.eaccessplus.eu

Lees onze disclaimer: www.accessibility.nl/algemeen/disclaimer
Accessibility is Member van het W3C
=========================
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 21:18:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT