W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Accessibility evaluation methodology

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:35:04 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA158E8.2010409@w3.org>
To: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
CC: Léonie Watson <lwatson@nomensa.com>, RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Joshue,

The initial objective was to collect publicly documented evaluation 
methodologies that we can learn from for the development of a WCAG2 
methodology. I'm not sure how such generic information supports this 
purpose. What precisely do you suggest adding to the wiki?

Thanks,
   Shadi


On 21.10.2011 10:36, Joshue O Connor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In terms of accessibility evaluation methodologies that are documented
> (in terms of an articulated framework) - I will play devils advocate and
> say that the kind of thing that Léonie is outlining is the lions share
> of what people do. In CFIT, we do the same kind of thing as Nomensa -
> with the addition of expert evaluation. The expert evaluation part is an
> established methodology - so if that helps Shadi maybe you could add it?
>
> Cheers
>
> Josh
>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 11:35:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:12 GMT