- From: Carlos A Velasco <carlos.velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:46:52 +0200
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: ERT WG <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi Shadi, As I said in the other thread, I still believe we shall insert the OWL imports as welland wait for feedback. regards, carlos Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > Hi Johannes, Carlos, > > Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/schema.rdf> > > Unless there is a reason not to, we should employ the same OWL header > and constructors approach in the HTTP-in-RDF, Content-in-RDF, and > Pointers-in-RDF specs, as we do in the EARL 1.0 Schema. > > Best, > Shadi > -- Dr Carlos A Velasco Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT Web Compliance Center: http://webcc.fit.fraunhofer.de/ imergo®: http://imergo.com/ · http://imergo.de/ Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 · Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Sunday, 21 June 2009 15:47:29 UTC