W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Editor's draft comments

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:09:51 +0100
Message-ID: <45F82C5F.6040506@w3.org>
To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Johannes Koch wrote:
> 
> Shadi Abou-Zahra schrieb:
>> SEMIAUTO: tool uses human(s) to make a decision. For example, a tool 
>> asks a human to verify that a given table is a layout vs data table, 
>> and based upon this input (and other indicators) decides the outcome 
>> of a test criterion.
> 
> This is my scenario 2. which was "manual" at least according to Carlos I.
> 
>> So in end effect its as Johannes indicated, the crucial part is if a 
>> human or tool actually made the *decision on the outcome in the 
>> context of the test criterion*.
> 
> Let me present two approaches for the same scenario:
> 
> 1.
> a) Tool finds table with structural elements.
> b) Human decides whether table is layout table.
> 
> 2.
> a) Tool finds table.
> b) Human decides whether table is layout table.
> c) Tool finds structural elements in layout table.
> 
> Is one of them semiauto?

What is the test in each of these?


Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 17:09:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:28 GMT