W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > September 2006

Re: do we want to omit the confidence property?

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:41:17 +0200
To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tghbu3tpwxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:15:55 +0200, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Charles,
> Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>>> I think the confidence property should be in EARL and we should  
>>> specify what it means. We can use a 3 level scale (high, medium and  
>>> low) or some sort of numeric scale.
>>  I think there is a reasonable arguent for keeping it in the spec and  
>> asking for datatyping of any Literal values. Ther is no  
>> interoperability and I do not believe that in a reasonable timeframe we  
>> have any hope of defining that, since it varies from test to test as  
>> well as from tester to tester.
> Can you elaborate on the argument for keeping this property in the spec?

People like Chris want to use it. I am happy to just remove it, too  
especially if result is constructed so you can't have more than one  
potental result.



   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 09:41:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:54 UTC