Hi Charles, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> I think the confidence property should be in EARL and we should >> specify what it means. We can use a 3 level scale (high, medium and >> low) or some sort of numeric scale. > > I think there is a reasonable arguent for keeping it in the spec and > asking for datatyping of any Literal values. Ther is no interoperability > and I do not believe that in a reasonable timeframe we have any hope of > defining that, since it varies from test to test as well as from tester > to tester. Can you elaborate on the argument for keeping this property in the spec? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 07:16:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT