W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > September 2006

Re: do we want to omit the confidence property?

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:15:55 +0200
Message-ID: <4518D3AB.6070606@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi Charles,

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>> I think the confidence property should be in EARL and we should 
>> specify what it means. We can use a 3 level scale (high, medium and 
>> low) or some sort of numeric scale.
> 
> I think there is a reasonable arguent for keeping it in the spec and 
> asking for datatyping of any Literal values. Ther is no interoperability 
> and I do not believe that in a reasonable timeframe we have any hope of 
> defining that, since it varies from test to test as well as from tester 
> to tester.

Can you elaborate on the argument for keeping this property in the spec?


Regards,
  Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | 
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ | 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | 
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France | 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 | 
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 07:16:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT