- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:14:28 +0200
- To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi, Carlos Iglesias wrote: > The only problem I see is that identifiers are supposed to be > unambiguous, and a build or version number (or a checksum) is not Right. We do not have IDs for earl:Software so using dc:identifier is probably not a good idea. We already have dc:title, dc:description, and dct:hasVersion. We should find something that describes the home page for the software, I imagine FOAF or VCard may be more appropriate than dc:URI. What about earl:WebContent? dc:identifier seems to be more stable than dc:URI. It is also generic enough that we could consider it as optional properties for earl:TestSubject and/or earl:Assertor classes too. Any thoughts on this? Best, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2006 06:14:33 UTC