- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:54:07 +0200
- To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi, > > The only problem I see is that identifiers are supposed to be > > unambiguous, and a build or version number (or a checksum) is not > > Right. We do not have IDs for earl:Software so using > dc:identifier is probably not a good idea. We already have > dc:title, dc:description, and dct:hasVersion. We should find > something that describes the home page for the software, I > imagine FOAF or VCard may be more appropriate than dc:URI. Maybe foaf:homepage could be a good candidate. > What about earl:WebContent? dc:identifier seems to be more > stable than dc:URI. It is also generic enough that we could > consider it as optional properties for earl:TestSubject > and/or earl:Assertor classes too. Any thoughts on this? The question is: Could we consider the URI as an identifier due to content negotiation? (as defined at dc: an unambiguous reference) If not I think we shouldn't use dc:identifier Regards, CI. -------------------------------------- Carlos Iglesias CTIC Foundation Science and Technology Park of Gijón 33203 - Gijón, Asturias, Spain phone: +34 984291212 fax: +34 984390612 email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 10:54:53 UTC