W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > April 2009

Re: [updated] database tables

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:07:10 +0200
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20090420155348.0361ceb0@esat.kuleuven.be>
To: <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>
Hi,

At 10:16 10/04/2009, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/WebInterface/Mockups/tables>
>
>I've made few changes to the database tables, I don't think this 
>needs any discussion (this is primarily for archiving purposes):
>
>- changed values in the Expected Result table [1] to reflect the 
>latest EARL draft [2]
>  [1] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/WebInterface/Mockups/tables#results>
>  [2] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090410>


Apparently, I overlooked an issue here.

In the previous working draft of EARL, we had "pass", "fail", 
"cannotTell", "notApplicable" and "notTested" [1]. The values for 
locations@expectedResult in both TCDL 1.0 and TCDL 2.0 were "pass", 
"fail", "cannotTell" and "notApplicable" [2], so they mapped 
perfectly to the values in EARL. If I remember correctly, the 
previous version of the database design used these values to support 
easy mapping between TCDL and the database [3].
The values in the current editor's draft are "passed", "failed", 
"cantTell", "inapplicable" and "untested" [4].
Why should we have to change the values in our database if the goal 
was to have interoperability with the TCDL format?

[1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-EARL10-Schema-20070323/#outcomevalue>
[2] <http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0.html#edef-locations>
[3] 
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2009Mar/0005.html>
[4] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090410#OutcomeValue>

Best regards,

Christophe


>- added the correct URI IDs to the Requirements table [3]
>  [3] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/WebInterface/Mockups/tables#reqs>
>
>- changed the field "Values" to "Vals" in the Structure Review table 
>[4] to avoid the use of reserved MySQL terms
>  [4] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/WebInterface/Mockups/tables#strrev>
>
>
>I'm continuing to work on the implementations and hope to have 
>something visible by next week (not in time for the call though).
>
>Regards,
>   Shadi
>
>--
>Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
>   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
>  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |

-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
---
"Better products and services through end-user empowerment" 
http://www.usem-net.eu/
---
Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other 
"social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but 
I haven't.
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 14:08:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 April 2009 14:08:20 GMT