W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-eo-wcag2tf@w3.org > July 2006

Re: "Process 101" requirements for your review and comment

From: Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:31:29 -0500
Message-ID: <44B507C1.9000806@trace.wisc.edu>
To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
CC: public-wai-eo-wcag2tf@w3.org

Looks good. One of the best explanations on this that I've seen was the 
"Chutes and Ladders" analogy Wendy used in various WCAG-related 
presentations. Not sure whether there was ever an illustrated version of 
this, but I think it might go a long way in helping folks understand the 
steps involved.


Shawn Henry wrote:
> EOWG WCAG 2 Task Force folks,
> Andrew and I have a draft requirements/analysis for the potential 
> "Process 101" (working title only) doc, available at:
>     http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process
> Please comment on this list about:
> * Does this cover what you think the doc should cover? What is missing?
> * Do you disagree with any of it?
> * Is the scope sufficiently defined?
> * What do you think about the items with question marks (??)s ?
> * Other thoughts...
> Note that we're not meeting for almost 2 weeks so it's important to do 
> work via the mailing list in the meantime.
> Thanks.
> ~ Shawn

Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2006 14:30:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 December 2010 18:16:52 GMT