Looks good. One of the best explanations on this that I've seen was the "Chutes and Ladders" analogy Wendy used in various WCAG-related presentations. Not sure whether there was ever an illustrated version of this, but I think it might go a long way in helping folks understand the steps involved. -Ben Shawn Henry wrote: > > EOWG WCAG 2 Task Force folks, > > Andrew and I have a draft requirements/analysis for the potential > "Process 101" (working title only) doc, available at: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process > > Please comment on this list about: > * Does this cover what you think the doc should cover? What is missing? > * Do you disagree with any of it? > * Is the scope sufficiently defined? > * What do you think about the items with question marks (??)s ? > * Other thoughts... > > Note that we're not meeting for almost 2 weeks so it's important to do > work via the mailing list in the meantime. > > Thanks. > ~ Shawn > -- Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu>Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2006 14:30:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:22 GMT