W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-eo-wcag2tf@w3.org > July 2006

Re: "Process 101" requirements for your review and comment

From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:20:25 +0200
Message-ID: <d809275c0607280120l7bd52ab6la018e8ade24e41b9@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Shawn Henry" <shawn@w3.org>, "Andrew Arch" <andrew.arch@nils.org.au>
Cc: public-wai-eo-wcag2tf@w3.org
Hi Shawn, Andrew & all.
This draft is clear and covers the important aspects of the subjetct.
I really think this can be a document used in other sections of W3C.

regards
ciao

pasquale




On 7/7/06, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> EOWG WCAG 2 Task Force folks,
> Andrew and I have a draft requirements/analysis for the potential "Process
> 101" (working title only) doc, available at:
>         http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process
> Please comment on this list about:
> * Does this cover what you think the doc should cover? What is missing?
> * Do you disagree with any of it?
> * Is the scope sufficiently defined?
> * What do you think about the items with question marks (??)s ?
> * Other thoughts...
> Note that we're not meeting for almost 2 weeks so it's important to do
> work via the mailing list in the meantime.
> Thanks.
> ~ Shawn
>
>
Received on Friday, 28 July 2006 08:20:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 December 2010 18:16:52 GMT