Re: "Process 101" requirements for your review and comment

Hi Shawn, Andrew & all.
This draft is clear and covers the important aspects of the subjetct.
I really think this can be a document used in other sections of W3C.

regards
ciao

pasquale




On 7/7/06, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> EOWG WCAG 2 Task Force folks,
> Andrew and I have a draft requirements/analysis for the potential "Process
> 101" (working title only) doc, available at:
>         http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process
> Please comment on this list about:
> * Does this cover what you think the doc should cover? What is missing?
> * Do you disagree with any of it?
> * Is the scope sufficiently defined?
> * What do you think about the items with question marks (??)s ?
> * Other thoughts...
> Note that we're not meeting for almost 2 weeks so it's important to do
> work via the mailing list in the meantime.
> Thanks.
> ~ Shawn
>
>