W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2016

Re: Requested addition to section 7.1

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 18:09:31 +0900
Cc: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-Id: <99E967A7-0A85-4D7E-9BA9-AE9312645C29@rivoal.net>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>

> On Dec 19, 2016, at 17:20, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> 
> On 19/12/2016 09:03, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> 
>> Given your reaction, given how "voluntary" this change is quoted, I am
>> requesting officially, as a Member, immediate disclosure of the full
>> and detailed rationale why it was urgently needed to so drastically
>> modify the Process of "one of the most successful WG of the W3C"
>> without the Membership in the loop and without respecting entirely
>> the Process, in conformance with Process Section 7.1.2 item 2.
> 
> I see that my phrasing above can be confusing, let me clarify: 7.1.2
> item 2 makes it mandatory to release the rationale behind a substantive
> charter change. I already explained why the charter announcement
> countains a report about the change but no rationale. I want the full
> rationale disclosed, with answers to my questions. Thanks, and sorry
> for the confusing phrasing again.

Having heard various participants in the CSSWG being baffled,
and being confused myself at how this came to be,
I would appreciate some transparency as well.

-Florian Rivoal
Vivliostyle AC Rep
Received on Monday, 19 December 2016 09:10:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 19 December 2016 09:10:03 UTC