W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2016

Re: Requested addition to section 7.1

From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:26:25 -0500
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, public-w3process@w3.org
Message-ID: <638a023e-e2e7-2296-e648-2cc9f682cad7@w3.org>


On 12/19/2016 3:20 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> On 19/12/2016 09:03, Daniel Glazman wrote:
>
>> Given your reaction, given how "voluntary" this change is quoted, I am
>> requesting officially, as a Member, immediate disclosure of the full
>> and detailed rationale why it was urgently needed to so drastically
>> modify the Process of "one of the most successful WG of the W3C"
>> without the Membership in the loop and without respecting entirely
>> the Process, in conformance with Process Section 7.1.2 item 2.
> I see that my phrasing above can be confusing, let me clarify: 7.1.2
> item 2 makes it mandatory to release the rationale behind a substantive
> charter change. I already explained why the charter announcement
> countains a report about the change but no rationale. I want the full
> rationale disclosed, with answers to my questions. Thanks, and sorry
> for the confusing phrasing again.

No problem with the phraseology.

I hope you consider my response in a different email as sufficient 
response.  Although, from my pov, it was actually not a substantive 
change.  I understand why you disagree.

>
> </Daniel>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 December 2016 13:26:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 19 December 2016 13:26:47 UTC