- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:26:25 -0500
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, public-w3process@w3.org
On 12/19/2016 3:20 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > On 19/12/2016 09:03, Daniel Glazman wrote: > >> Given your reaction, given how "voluntary" this change is quoted, I am >> requesting officially, as a Member, immediate disclosure of the full >> and detailed rationale why it was urgently needed to so drastically >> modify the Process of "one of the most successful WG of the W3C" >> without the Membership in the loop and without respecting entirely >> the Process, in conformance with Process Section 7.1.2 item 2. > I see that my phrasing above can be confusing, let me clarify: 7.1.2 > item 2 makes it mandatory to release the rationale behind a substantive > charter change. I already explained why the charter announcement > countains a report about the change but no rationale. I want the full > rationale disclosed, with answers to my questions. Thanks, and sorry > for the confusing phrasing again. No problem with the phraseology. I hope you consider my response in a different email as sufficient response. Although, from my pov, it was actually not a substantive change. I understand why you disagree. > > </Daniel> > > >
Received on Monday, 19 December 2016 13:26:46 UTC