W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2016

Re: Requested addition to section 7.1

From: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:24:59 -0800
Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-id: <1ABB0180-B171-4156-907D-99DF6E3E3643@mac.com>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Yes, agreed, we miss defining what happens to anything other than a technical document, here.

I assume (until we cut over to GitHub) you should raise an Issue.

> On Dec 16, 2016, at 0:39 , Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello.
> 
> I think we miss something in section 7.1
> 
> 7.1.2 item 2 links to "substantive changes" in section 6.2.5 but the
> list there refers to technical documents only.
> 
> "Substantive changes" is then undefined for Charter review or even for
> Process review.
> 
> In the missing definition, and following a recent event that deeply
> shocked me, I think we need to categorize "changes that impact the
> internal process of the Group" as changes beyond "substantive" and
> falling into 7.1.2 item 3, "returned for additional work”.

do you have a pointer?  it’s nice to have a “test case” or example

> 

> Thanks.
> 
> </Daniel>
> 

Dave Singer

singer@mac.com
Received on Friday, 16 December 2016 17:25:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 16 December 2016 17:25:39 UTC