W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Revising Appeals of Directors Decisions following an AC Review, Part 1 of 2

From: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:47:17 -0700
Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Message-id: <2468BDF0-8546-4531-8076-85516375463C@mac.com>
To: timeless@gmail.com
Oh, then we should be clear “on whether to advance”?


> On Aug 28, 2016, at 6:56 , timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm wondering about the case where he made the decision not to advance.
> 
> 
> On Aug 26, 2016 11:50 AM, "David Singer" <singer@mac.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:52 , timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> REPLACEMENT: "The Advisory Committee representatives MAY initiate an
> >> Advisory Committee
> >> appeal<http://www.w3.org/2015/04/Process-20150428/#ACAppeal> to the W3C
> >> Decision to advance the technical report."
> >
> > to advance => on advancing
> 
> really?  he made a ‘decision to advance the technical report’, i.e. a decision to do something.  it sounds right to me…
> 
> >
> 
> Dave Singer
> 
> singer@mac.com
> 

Dave Singer

singer@mac.com
Received on Monday, 29 August 2016 23:47:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 August 2016 23:47:50 UTC