W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Revising Appeals of Directors Decisions following an AC Review, Part 1 of 2

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 09:56:10 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAKMeYjFH3U0XzsTWxEb0UJEFHagOOjxX5LjAZEMZVDYUjYo3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
I'm wondering about the case where he made the decision not to advance.

On Aug 26, 2016 11:50 AM, "David Singer" <singer@mac.com> wrote:

>
> > On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:52 , timeless <timeless@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >> REPLACEMENT: "The Advisory Committee representatives MAY initiate an
> >> Advisory Committee
> >> appeal<http://www.w3.org/2015/04/Process-20150428/#ACAppeal> to the W3C
> >> Decision to advance the technical report."
> >
> > to advance => on advancing
>
> really?  he made a ‘decision to advance the technical report’, i.e. a
> decision to do something.  it sounds right to me…
>
> >
>
> Dave Singer
>
> singer@mac.com
>
>
Received on Sunday, 28 August 2016 13:56:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 28 August 2016 13:56:39 UTC