Re: Updated [Was: UI Mockup [Was: CfC: create a public list to announce new publications; deadline Oct 15]]

On 2014-11-06 22:03, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
> 07.11.2014, 03:02, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>:
>> On Nov 4, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>>>   Hi Art,
>>>
>>>   Here's a rudimentary UI to make it easier for chairs and team contacts to send these review notices:
>>>   http://www.w3.org/2014/11/getreview/
> Thanks for adding Working Drafts. But since they are the common case (there is one FPWD, hopefully only one CR, and so on) why put them so far down.
>
> Also, why not call it "Working Draft" in the menu, instead of offering just alphabet soup? And nit-picking, Editor's draft isn't strictly a process state, and precr isnt one at all.
>
> There is a limited time during which there will be Last Calls or CRs under the 2005 process.
>
> Since we're going for bare-bones anyway, please use a date picker for dates.
>
>> Some updates:
>>
>> * List name: public-review-announce@w3.org
>>
>> FAQ:
>>
>> ===
>> Q. Am I required to use this list to get wide review?
>> A. No.
>>
>> Q. Does announcing a publication on this review list constitute wide review?
>> A. No. The announcement is merely an invitation to review. The W3C Process expects actual reviews to happen.
>>
>> Q. Can we send this call for review for any type of publication?
>> A. Yes, except Recommendation.

A WG could point to a section of a REC and ask a question about it -- 
like, "we don't see this being used, what do you think of deprecating it 
in a future revision?"  or something about errata.  I think we should 
drop the last question.  The other two are the essential ones.

>> ===
>>
>> Anything else to add to the FAQ?
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> --
>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>
>

Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 17:04:45 UTC