- From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 07:03:22 +0100
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
07.11.2014, 03:02, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>: > On Nov 4, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: >> Hi Art, >> >> Here's a rudimentary UI to make it easier for chairs and team contacts to send these review notices: >> http://www.w3.org/2014/11/getreview/ Thanks for adding Working Drafts. But since they are the common case (there is one FPWD, hopefully only one CR, and so on) why put them so far down. Also, why not call it "Working Draft" in the menu, instead of offering just alphabet soup? And nit-picking, Editor's draft isn't strictly a process state, and precr isnt one at all. There is a limited time during which there will be Last Calls or CRs under the 2005 process. Since we're going for bare-bones anyway, please use a date picker for dates. > Some updates: > > * List name: public-review-announce@w3.org > > FAQ: > > === > Q. Am I required to use this list to get wide review? > A. No. > > Q. Does announcing a publication on this review list constitute wide review? > A. No. The announcement is merely an invitation to review. The W3C Process expects actual reviews to happen. > > Q. Can we send this call for review for any type of publication? > A. Yes, except Recommendation. > === > > Anything else to add to the FAQ? > > Ian > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 06:03:55 UTC