W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Spec organizations and prioritization

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:58:50 +0100
To: "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>
Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.wbi78cu764w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:50:45 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>  
wrote:
> I assume the technical content of the snapshot wouldn't change from your
> PPPR status to PP Rec, right?

Right.


> What about implementation experience on the said snapshot? My (possibly
> wrong) understanding is that companies wouldn't want to license stuff
> that isn't actually used.

That does not seem to have been a problem with many Recommendations to  
date where maybe one or two companies have an implementation of sorts, but  
most don't. If that is actually a problem we could use stability markers  
(which W3C should really copy from WHATWG) to reduce scope, but the  
simpler process the better imo.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 17:59:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 9 October 2013 23:56:58 UTC