public-w3process@w3.org from March 2012 by author

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)

Arthur Barstow

• Re: formatting fixed: an alternative to the current REC process (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Questionnaire: List of Concerns about Standards Development in W3C [Was: Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications] (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB] (Tuesday, 6 March)
• What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB] (Monday, 5 March)

Carr, Wayne

• RE: Spec organizations and prioritization (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Spec organizations and prioritization (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Friday, 23 March)
• RE: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• RE: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: formatting fixed: an alternative to the current REC process (Wednesday, 21 March)
• RE: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Wednesday, 21 March)
• formatting fixed: an alternative to the current REC process (Tuesday, 20 March)
• corrected: an alternative to the current REC process (Tuesday, 20 March)
• an alternative to the current REC process (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Tuesday, 20 March)
• RE: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Monday, 19 March)
• RE: Patent Policy issues... (Tuesday, 13 March)
• RE: Patent Policy issues... (Tuesday, 13 March)
• RE: Patent Policy issues... (Monday, 12 March)
• RE: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC (Friday, 9 March)
• RE: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC (Wednesday, 7 March)
• RE: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC (Wednesday, 7 March)
• html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC (Wednesday, 7 March)
• RE: snapshots vs. living standards (Saturday, 3 March)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• Survey: topics for W3C members to consider (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Patent Policy issues... (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: snapshots vs living standards (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: snapshots vs living standards (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: snapshots vs living standards (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: marking obsolete TRs - ISSUE-2 (Monday, 5 March)

Daniel Glazman

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Evaluating policies; pubrules (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Bottlenecks in the Rec track (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Features vs specs (Monday, 19 March)

Eduardo Gutentag

• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Tuesday, 20 March)

fantasai

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Wednesday, 21 March)

Giuseppe Pascale

• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Monday, 19 March)
• How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Monday, 19 March)

Ian Jacobs

• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Tuesday, 13 March)

Jeff Jaffe

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Sunday, 25 March)
• Re: W3C Spec Tester/Editor's Fund Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Monday, 12 March)
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Patent Policy issues... (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB] (Monday, 5 March)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: snapshots vs living standards (Monday, 5 March)

Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: snapshots vs living standards (Monday, 5 March)
• Re: snapshots vs living standards (Monday, 5 March)

L. David Baron

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Sunday, 25 March)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Saturday, 24 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider (Friday, 23 March)
• W3C Spec Tester/Editor's Fund Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Features vs specs (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Features vs specs (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Features vs specs (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: snapshots vs living standards (Saturday, 3 March)

Olivier Thereaux

• Re: snapshots vs living standards (Monday, 5 March)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: html4 vs html5 and "superseded RECs" when there isn't a new REC (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: marking old TRs as obsolete - RE: "Living Standards" (Friday, 2 March)
• snapshots vs living standards (Friday, 2 March)

Rand McRanderson

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Saturday, 24 March)
• Proposal: Approval on a section by section basis of a draft (Saturday, 24 March)

Robert Freund

• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Wednesday, 21 March)

Robin Berjon

• Re: snapshots vs living standards (Saturday, 3 March)

Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

• Current discussion - needed organization (Monday, 26 March)
• AW: Survey: topics for W3C members to consider (Friday, 23 March)
• AW: Features vs specs (Tuesday, 20 March)
• AW: Patent Policy issues... (Tuesday, 13 March)
• AW: What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB] (Wednesday, 7 March)
• AW: What are the PD/PP constraints? [Was: Re: Request by AB] (Tuesday, 6 March)

Stephen Zilles

• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Tuesday, 20 March)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: Spec organizations and prioritization (Friday, 23 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Features vs specs (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: Features vs specs (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: snapshots vs living standards (Saturday, 3 March)

therandshow@gmail.com

• Re: Current discussion - needed organization (Wednesday, 28 March)

Tobie Langel

• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Thursday, 22 March)
• Re: Put Editor's draft on TR page, not heartbeat formal publications -> RE: Evaluating policies; pubrules (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: How can external organization reference draft W3C specifications (Monday, 19 March)

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 March 2012 01:45:55 UTC