W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: Person job proposal (was Re: Schema.org proposal: Financial information)

From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:35:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CADK2AU0tVBdRUfEcHX=RB378V0ROqKQrxat6hTfnWu+CM71W+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Cc: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
>
> "Could be; I did not because offers comes from the "old" schema.org ecommerce
> model (in GR the link is from the Offer to the Product, not vice versa).
> But if this property is meant to live, it could be added to Service, too."


So far I've been using MTEs to express a Service offers an Offer, which
works but I've always considered it a bit cumbersome.

Next to that I've also encountered quite some sites (sorry, no URL out the
top of my head) where I saw services being marked up as a Product so
'offers' could be used. Which I think finds it origin in the fact that few
are aware multi-type entities can be used.

Adding 'offers' to Service maybe could help Service be used more often as
opposed to falsely using Product.

2014-09-19 11:22 GMT+02:00 martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org <
martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>:

> Could be; I did not because offers comes from the "old" schema.org
> ecommerce model (in GR the link is from the Offer to the Product, not vice
> versa).
>
> But if this property is meant to live, it could be added to Service, too.
> Martin
>
>
>
>
> On 18 Sep 2014, at 22:34, Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Can the one submitting the respective pull request please make sure that
> the additional rangeIncludes statements are added to chema:itemOffered and
> schema:typeOfGood?
> >
> > Shouldn't 'offers' be added to Service as well than?
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-09-18 22:14 GMT+02:00 Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:15 AM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org <
> martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
> > > and maybe while on it, for schema:itemOffered we could extend
> > > schema:rangeIncludes with Service and Role ?
> > >
> > > :)
> > >
> >
> > See above. We must do that.
> >
> > Can the one submitting the respective pull request please make sure that
> the additional rangeIncludes statements are added to chema:itemOffered and
> schema:typeOfGood?
> >
> > I'll update the proposal and circulate that before putting together a
> pull request.
> >
> > - Vicki
> >
> > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Friday, 19 September 2014 09:36:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC