W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: ItemList proposal

From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:10:44 +0200
Message-ID: <5418A754.4010202@wwelves.org>
To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 09/12/2014 02:56 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
> So people can use schema:Ascending or schema:Descending while still being able to use free text for other cases?
> 
> For "unordered", I would simply omit the itemListOrder property.
Doesn't it put us in Closed-world assumption?
I must admit not knowing if schema.org tries to follow Open-world
assumption.
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 21:12:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC