W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: ItemList proposal

From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:39:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOr1obFxp5uu_BjjNN0qKwOULWPeGzeVQis-sC+3M43psVwf2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>, "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> Yeah, we do try to avoid ontological vanity. If it's a choice between
> us thinking "oh dear, that could've been better named" and 1000s of
> sites having already adopted something even if awkwardly designed, we
> lean towards being a bit ugly and living with the deployed reality.
> Unless there's a serious usability/intelligibility benefit, or it's
> part of a larger consistency cleanup. In this case it's not sounding
> like we've a strong enough case for renaming - so I think you're
> right. Jason/Vicki, any objections to restoring itemListElement?

+1 to restoring itemListElement to preserve current usage.

- Vicki

Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 19:39:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC