W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2014

Re: ItemList proposal

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:06:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=4vAkgOBTm-Ozm1-p1G1Yv5WA9CROWkVmBkSTukhQrvzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Cc: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>, "Jason Johnson (BING)" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, PublicVocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 11 September 2014 20:39, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, we do try to avoid ontological vanity. If it's a choice between
>> us thinking "oh dear, that could've been better named" and 1000s of
>> sites having already adopted something even if awkwardly designed, we
>> lean towards being a bit ugly and living with the deployed reality.
>> Unless there's a serious usability/intelligibility benefit, or it's
>> part of a larger consistency cleanup. In this case it's not sounding
>> like we've a strong enough case for renaming - so I think you're
>> right. Jason/Vicki, any objections to restoring itemListElement?
>
>
> +1 to restoring itemListElement to preserve current usage.

I've updated github + test build accordingly. --Dan

> - Vicki
>
>
> Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com
>
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 20:07:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:44 UTC