W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [a11y-metadata-project] meeting Monday? NO

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:21:23 +0200
To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@google.com>, "Gerardo Capiel" <gerardoc@benetech.org>
Cc: "Liddy Nevile" <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>, "Charles Myers" <charlesm@benetech.org>, "Richard Schwerdtfeger" <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com" <a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>, "Alexander Shubin" <ajax@yandex-team.ru>, "Andy Heath" <andyheath@axelrod.plus.com>, "Dan Scott" <dan@coffeecode.net>, "Egor Antonov" <elderos@yandex-team.ru>, Emmanuelle GutiƩrrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>, "Jason Johnson" <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, "George Kerscher" <kerscher@montana.com>, "Madeleine Rothberg" <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>, "Matt Garrish" <matt.garrish@bell.net>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.w38wdxfvy3oazb@chaals.local>
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:31:38 +0200, Gerardo Capiel <gerardoc@benetech.org>  
wrote:

> Dan,
>
> Matt Garrish is going to be following up in the next day or so with what  
> you're requesting help with below.  We'll keep it focused to just  
> mediaFeature and >accessHazard, since those seem to be the least  
> controversial properties and are mostly standalone.  We're not having to  
> deal with vocabularies values for what >you need, so we can accommodate  
> the proposed negative values for accessHazard later.

Just a quick note to say this seems to be a good way forward.

Thanks everyone...

cheers

Chaals

>
> Gerardo
>
> Gerardo Capiel
> VP of Engineering
> benetech
>
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 1:35 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok, keep us posted! Sorry I couldn't make thursday's call.
>>
>> This week I'm making test builds of the schema.org site with some
>> work-in-progress vocabulary. For example
>> http://sdo-actions.appspot.com/ActionHandler does this for Actions
>> work-in-progress. I'd like to do the same for Accessibility drafts. Is
>> there someone who can work with me on this? The necessary config file
>> format is more or less RDFa+RDFS in HTML, see
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/c70ba13bab40/schema.org/ext/sameas.html
>> ... can we start with the most consensual areas and work out
>> incrementally from there, perhaps?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30 September 2013 07:02, Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>  
>> wrote:
>>> suits me!
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> Liddy
>>>
>>> On 30/09/2013, at 12:28 PM, Charles Myers wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9/29/2013 6:46 PM, Liddy Nevile wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> is there a Monday 30th Sept call, pls???
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the ping, Liddy.
>>>>
>>>> I think our call on Thursday was great, and I'm still writing.  
>>>> Charles is
>>>> unavailable on Monday. I don't think it makes sense to have another  
>>>> call
>>>> until a concrete set of ideas are out there (last Thursday's  
>>>> productive call
>>>> is still a lot to absorb into a full set of use cases).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>



-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 22:22:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:31 UTC