W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2013

Re: [a11y-metadata-project] schema.org test

From: Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:37:06 +1000
Cc: Charles Myers <charlesm@benetech.org>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Gerardo Capiel <gerardoc@benetech.org>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com" <a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>, Alexander Shubin <ajax@yandex-team.ru>, Andy Heath <andyheath@axelrod.plus.com>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, Egor Antonov <elderos@yandex-team.ru>, Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>, Jason Johnson <jasjoh@microsoft.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, Madeleine Rothberg <madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org>, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@bell.net>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4B9C34D9-E7DB-4DE4-8773-2376D0C1CEC0@sunriseresearch.org>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>

I think we are in agreement that there will be accessHazard - which  
will say that there is not a hazard hiding in the resource (Charles'  
advice is to do it this way)

then there will be accessMode and that will be a combination of the  
modes that will provide a complete version of the content -

eg visual + text for a video file with captions etc - even if it also  
has audio...
and visual + audio - for the video with its usual audio
and maybe text if it is possible to get all the content from text -  
visual and audio replacements

then there will be accessFeatures
eg transformableText so that all text is in a format that can be  
rendered as Braille.... etc.....

I think that the breakdown of what are the full set of values for  
these three ar not yet finally decided.

I hope that helps...

--- and pls read my other email or talk to Charles about December :-)


On 30/09/2013, at 6:35 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:

> Ok, keep us posted! Sorry I couldn't make thursday's call.
> This week I'm making test builds of the schema.org site with some
> work-in-progress vocabulary. For example
> http://sdo-actions.appspot.com/ActionHandler does this for Actions
> work-in-progress. I'd like to do the same for Accessibility drafts. Is
> there someone who can work with me on this? The necessary config file
> format is more or less RDFa+RDFS in HTML, see
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/file/c70ba13bab40/schema.org/ext/sameas.html
> ... can we start with the most consensual areas and work out
> incrementally from there, perhaps?
> Dan
> On 30 September 2013 07:02, Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>  
> wrote:
>> suits me!
>> thanks
>> Liddy
>> On 30/09/2013, at 12:28 PM, Charles Myers wrote:
>>> On 9/29/2013 6:46 PM, Liddy Nevile wrote:
>>>> is there a Monday 30th Sept call, pls???
>>> Thanks for the ping, Liddy.
>>> I think our call on Thursday was great, and I'm still writing.  
>>> Charles is
>>> unavailable on Monday. I don't think it makes sense to have  
>>> another call
>>> until a concrete set of ideas are out there (last Thursday's  
>>> productive call
>>> is still a lot to absorb into a full set of use cases).
Received on Monday, 30 September 2013 21:19:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:29:31 UTC