- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 13:52:16 +0200
- To: W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Cc: Ian Niles <ianiles@microsoft.com>, Sam Goto <goto@google.com>, Alexander Shubin <ajax@yandex-team.ru>
Thanks everyone for the discussion and contributions - we made a few improvements and have just published the initial version of this work at schema.org: * http://schema.org/Action * http://schema.org/docs/full.html * Machine readable version is included in http://schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html (plus a little RDFa/RDFS in each per-term page). As mentioned at the start of this thread (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Jul/0090.html) the plan is to move on from past-tense Actions to address the other scenarios explored in earlier drafts, i.e. the description of potential future actions, and mechanisms for handling them. As part of this we expect to clarify how Actions relate to Events. For now, we have added Action as a direct sub-type of Thing; this is uncontroversial enough as everything is considered a 'Thing'. The existing http://schema.org/Event type currently has a very broad definition (one that would embrace Actions as agent-intended events) , but in practice focusses on social events / happenings. There is also an outstanding proposal to improve Event, including the handling of repeating events (see http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/EventSchemaUpdate). As you can see, there is plenty more to do, but we're glad to have achieved this milestone as a foundation for richer description of actions. Please let us know of any bugs, mistakes or inclarities and we'll do our best to keep improving schema.org step by step. cheers, Dan (for the schema.org team)
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 11:52:43 UTC