W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2012

Re: new itemscope or not?

From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:46:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CABzDd=62UXbT=Ss0pCAFUJh1o8Y0UGpdf16q8WHV38kznfYSaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dawson, Laura" <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>
Cc: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Dawson, Laura <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com> wrote:
> I just realized this as I tried to insert the ISNI into this entry.
>
> itemid="0000 0001 2103 2683", but there needs to be a way to refer that
> number back to the identifier scheme that says "this is an ISNI"

Hopefully someday there will be URLs for each ISNI. But until then, if
ISNIs are important to you (which I imagine they are given your Bowker
address) I'd probably look into registering [2] a URN namespace so you
could use itemid="urn:isni:0000000121032683". If you need help doing
this I would be interested. The IETF URN discussion list [3] would be
a good place to coordinate it.

//Ed

[1] http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xml
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3406
[3] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 18:47:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 September 2012 18:47:20 GMT