W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > September 2012

Re: new itemscope or not?

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:42:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CAChbWaM4dw7PErDPHcJUdm7tvUzN2ixXO6ZGbkH+od+WCbi+Yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That is not an author.  That is a weblink identifier about an author
> entity
> > named William Shakespeare.
> Hey, I thought this list was immune to httpRange-14 discussion! :-D
> //Ed

Not entirely so. ;-)  But Laura hits upon it.  itemid 's are not always web
identifiers.  I wonder if it is logical to have an class property for "web"
identifiers ?  Similar to how in Freebase we have
/common/topic/topical_webpage ?  William Shakespeare's topical webpages
Worldcat's full web identifier for him is

namespaces for identifiers (keys) might be overkill for Schema.org however
but might make perfect sense only for the itemid level :
https://dev.freebase.com/m/081k8?keys&domain=/common ??

Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 18:42:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 September 2012 18:42:46 GMT