W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > April 2012

Re: proposal for new classes Activity and Action

From: Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:17:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CACWrOGYF+iV831UZaf0QBzN_ugg8-KakZT1Sa=HquW5QzETBTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
I've added all the URLs on this thread to the "selected related work"
section of the Activity/Action proposal.

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:47, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

> On 20 April 2012 21:39, Daniel Dulitz <daniel@google.com> wrote:
> > Makes sense Danny. Please continue to monitor discussion on
> Action/Activity
> > to make sure they'll be extensible for your use case. Others have
> contacted
> > me offline about their desire to represent "subtasks," and the Event
> > Ontology that Bob mentioned in this thread also seems to argue for having
> > some kind of subEvent/subActivity relation available.
>
> Just to drop a quick link in here - in the NoTube EU project (which I
> worked on until recently too) we had a need to reflect activity
> streams model into RDF. This was for some work on generating TV
> recommendations based on social Web activities. There's a draft spec
> at  http://xmlns.notu.be/aair/
>
> I think the details matter less than that several of us converged on a
> similar design space. I take this as a good sign...
>
> Enjoy your weekends,
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan
>
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 20:18:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 May 2012 06:49:02 GMT