Re: <time>, <meta>, <data> in schema.org examples

In addition, using <time> per the examples given for Restaurant
@openingHours produces errors in the webmaster tool.  Using <time> per the
specification does not.  So, perhaps the examples are erroneous?

Rob


On 11/17/11 4:13 AM, "Martin Hepp" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:

>Dear Dan, all:
>
>As far as I know, the <time> element is being dropped from the HTML5
>Microdata spec, but there has been some debate on this [2].
>
>I saw that many examples on the schema.org pages have been updated to use
><meta> and <data> instead, but there are still examples with <time>.
>
>Giving the ongoing discussion - what is Google's position on using <time>
>in schema.org markup in Microdata syntax? Should it be all migrated to
>meta/data or is this irrelevant for you?
>
>If you want to drop <time>, then please update all schema.org
>documentation accordingly, e.g.
>
>   http://schema.org/LocalBusiness
>
>Thanks for a clarification.
>
>I assume that the uncertainty about this part of Microdata modeling
>creates a lot of friction for developers willing to add schema.org to
>their sites.
>
>Best
>
>
>Martin Hepp
>[1] http://blog.whatwg.org/weekly-time-data
>[2] http://blog.whatwg.org/weekly-tpac-2011
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>martin hepp
>e-business & web science research group
>universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
>
>e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
>phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
>fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
>www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
>         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
>skype:   mfhepp 
>twitter: mfhepp
>
>Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
>=================================================================
>* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
>

Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 15:55:56 UTC