W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > June 2017

Re: [DRAFT] TTWG's response to your comments about IMSC 1.0.1

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 07:30:39 +0200
To: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
Cc: W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <52c304da-db89-650b-cdb7-59a4fe3b068e@w3.org>


Le 09/06/2017 à 10:52, Nigel Megitt a écrit :
> Thierry,
>
> this seems to suggest that external reviewers who are not members of W3C
> have the option to raise a formal objection with the Director. Is that
> true?


Why would an external reviewers (not members of W3C) couldn't
raise a formal objection with the Director ?
The spec review is open to everyone including the public.


See process document:
https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#Consensus


3.3 Consensus

Consensus is a core value of W3C. To promote consensus, the W3C process 
requires Chairs to ensure that groups consider all legitimate views and 
objections, and endeavor to resolve them, whether these views and 
objections are expressed by the active participants of the group or by 
others (e.g., another W3C group, a group in another organization, or the 
general public). Decisions may be made during meetings (face-to-face or 
distributed) as well as through email. Note: The Director, CEO, and COO 
have the role of assessing consensus within the Advisory Committee.
[...]

3.3.2 Recording and Reporting Formal Objections

In the W3C process, an individual may register a Formal Objection to a 
decision.  [...]


Thierry




>
> Kind regards,
>
> Nigel
>
>
> On 09/06/2017, 08:40, "Thierry MICHEL" <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Pierre,
>>
>> Here is the boiler plate to respond to the IMSC 1.0.1 comments
>> (example here for ARIB)
>> Note that I propose to request for approuval before 18 June 2017.
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>> =====================================================================
>> The Timed Text Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on
>> the Wide Review Working Draft [2] of IMSC 1.0.1 published on 22 March
>> 2017. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to
>> send us comments.
>>
>> The Working Group's response to your comments is included below.
>>
>> Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
>> public-tt@w3.org?subject=%5Bimsc%5D if you agree with it or not before
>> 18 June 2017. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
>> specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group.
>> If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the
>> opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by
>> the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in
>> the W3C Recommendation Track.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> For the Timed Text Working Group,
>> Thierry Michel
>> W3C Staff Contact
>>
>> 1. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2017May/0018.html
>> 2. https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-ttml-imsc1.0.1-20170322/
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Working Group's response to your comments
>> ----------------------------------------
>>
>> A-  Your comment on activeArea attribute
>>
>> @@ WG's response to be added here @@
>>
>>
>> B- Your comment on fillLineGap attribute
>> @@ WG's response to be added here @@
>>
>>
>> ========================================================================
>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 12 June 2017 05:30:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:40 UTC