W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tt@w3.org > June 2017

Re: [DRAFT] TTWG's response to your comments about IMSC 1.0.1

From: Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:52:26 +0000
To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
CC: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>, W3C Public TTWG <public-tt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A9069EE0-F7DD-40D8-8E9C-9DE71ABE045E@bbc.co.uk>
Thierry,

Thank you for the explanation.

Nigel



> On 12 Jun 2017, at 06:30, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Le 09/06/2017 à 10:52, Nigel Megitt a écrit :
>> Thierry,
>>
>> this seems to suggest that external reviewers who are not members of W3C
>> have the option to raise a formal objection with the Director. Is that
>> true?
>
>
> Why would an external reviewers (not members of W3C) couldn't
> raise a formal objection with the Director ?
> The spec review is open to everyone including the public.
>
>
> See process document:
> https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#Consensus

>
>
> 3.3 Consensus
>
> Consensus is a core value of W3C. To promote consensus, the W3C process requires Chairs to ensure that groups consider all legitimate views and objections, and endeavor to resolve them, whether these views and objections are expressed by the active participants of the group or by others (e.g., another W3C group, a group in another organization, or the general public). Decisions may be made during meetings (face-to-face or distributed) as well as through email. Note: The Director, CEO, and COO have the role of assessing consensus within the Advisory Committee.
> [...]
>
> 3.3.2 Recording and Reporting Formal Objections
>
> In the W3C process, an individual may register a Formal Objection to a decision.  [...]
>
>
> Thierry
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Nigel
>>
>>
>>> On 09/06/2017, 08:40, "Thierry MICHEL" <tmichel@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Pierre,
>>>
>>> Here is the boiler plate to respond to the IMSC 1.0.1 comments
>>> (example here for ARIB)
>>> Note that I propose to request for approuval before 18 June 2017.
>>>
>>> Thierry
>>>
>>> =====================================================================
>>> The Timed Text Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on
>>> the Wide Review Working Draft [2] of IMSC 1.0.1 published on 22 March
>>> 2017. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to
>>> send us comments.
>>>
>>> The Working Group's response to your comments is included below.
>>>
>>> Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
>>> public-tt@w3.org?subject=%5Bimsc%5D if you agree with it or not before
>>> 18 June 2017. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
>>> specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group.
>>> If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the
>>> opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by
>>> the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in
>>> the W3C Recommendation Track.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> For the Timed Text Working Group,
>>> Thierry Michel
>>> W3C Staff Contact
>>>
>>> 1. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2017May/0018.html

>>> 2. https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-ttml-imsc1.0.1-20170322/

>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>> Working Group's response to your comments
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>
>>> A-  Your comment on activeArea attribute
>>>
>>> @@ WG's response to be added here @@
>>>
>>>
>>> B- Your comment on fillLineGap attribute
>>> @@ WG's response to be added here @@
>>>
>>>
>>> ========================================================================
>>>
>>
>>


-----------------------------
http://www.bbc.co.uk

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
this.
-----------------------------
Received on Monday, 12 June 2017 08:52:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 October 2017 18:24:40 UTC